Mats Rosenkranz vs Aristotelis Thanos Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 Aug at 08:07 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Rosenkranz vs A. Thanos

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GRE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Rosenkranz 1 - 0 Thanos
They have played 3 sets in total, with Mats Rosenkranz winning 2 and Aristotelis Thanos winning 1. The last match between Mats Rosenkranz and Aristotelis Thanos was at the Hersonissos 4 Challenger, 19-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Mats Rosenkranz getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Rosenkranz | 1 |
Thanos | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Hersonissos 4 Challenger(08-19-25)
M. Rosenkranz vs A. Thanos H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$4,755 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
51.45% (319-301) | Career Total W/L | 63.35% (140-81) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
9 | Titles | 3 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 100.00% (1-0) |
M. Rosenkranz vs A. Thanos Match Preview:
- How well are players performing on their second serve lately? Rosenkranz is ahead, winning 46.75% of points compared to Thanos's 40.82%.
- Who has the edge in return games? Thanos excels with 50.85% of opponent's second serve points won, while Rosenkranz achieves 43.06%.
- When returning first serves, Thanos leads by converting 30.3% of chances, surpassing Rosenkranz's 21.58%.
- Under pressure, Rosenkranz saves 56.38% of breakpoints, stronger than Thanos’s 49.37% success rate.
- Yearly performance: Thanos holds a win rate of 73.17%, superior to Rosenkranz's 60.76%.
- Considering surfaces, Thanos shines on indoor hard courts with a 71% success rate, while Rosenkranz's best is 60% on grass.
- Both players mainly compete in Futures/Satellite/ITF $10K events, which frames their match levels comparably. Thanos wins 78.13% there, Rosenkranz 68.29%.
- Which player contests higher-ranked opponents? Rosenkranz faces tougher competitors, averaging rank 384.71 compared to Thanos's 466.61.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Thanos is more successful, winning 75% of these, compared to Rosenkranz's 60%.
- Break point effectiveness favors Thanos, who converts 36.72% of opportunities, better than Rosenkranz’s 24.11%.
Editorial Prediction (August 19, 2025, UTC):
Thanos displays superior performance in return games, both against first and second serves, showcasing an ability to capitalize on his opponent's weaknesses. This advantage is crucial in breaking serve and gaining the upper hand in matches.
Rosenkranz holds a lead in second serve points, indicating steadier serve play, but struggles to convert break points as effectively as Thanos. While pressure handling in breakpoint situations favors Rosenkranz slightly, the overall metrics suggest more strengths in Thanos's game.
Given Thanos's stronger stats in key areas such as match performance, return games, and deciding sets, he seems poised to take the victory in this encounter, despite Rosenkranz's commendable efforts against higher-ranked players.
Predicting based on recent trends and relevant statistics, Thanos is the likely winner of the upcoming match.
Mats Rosenkranz vs Aristotelis Thanos Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Rosenkranz vs A. Thanos H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
16 | Games Won | 13 |
3 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
8 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
2:58:2 | Average Match Time | 2:58:2 |
55% (51/93) | 1st Serve % | 60% (55/92) |
75% (38/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (35/55) |
43% (18/42) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (18/37) |
50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (4/8) |
42% (39/92) | Return Points Win % | 40% (37/93) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Rosenkranz Recent Matches Played
A. Thanos Recent Matches Played

M. Rosenkranz vs A. Thanos Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
51.45% (319/301) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.35% (140/81) |
50.38% (720/709) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.05% (301/192) |
50.74% (7074/6867) | Games Win/Loss | 55.39% (2540/2046) |
44.59% (66/82) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.04% (65/47) |
49.12% (112/116) | Clay Win/Loss | 68.42% (65/30) |
57.64% (132/97) | Indoor Hard W/L | 71.43% (10/4) |
60.00% (9/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.58 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
3963 | Aces Total | 470 |
0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
1990 | Total Double Faults | 669 |
1:24:40 | Average Match Time | 1:12:53 |
462.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 358.56 |
60% (22001/36626) | 1st Serve % | 59% (5868/9869) |
75% (16406/22001) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (3959/5868) |
48% (7023/14625) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1833/4001) |
39% (1205/3126) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (517/1066) |
37% (13699/37227) | Return Points Win % | 43% (4178/9687) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 66.67% (4/2) |
16.67% (1/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
46.07% (82/96) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (9/9) |
54.13% (236/200) | Futures W/L | 64.47% (127/70) |
51% (312/609) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (137/214) |
100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
49% (116/235) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (27/48) |
56% (110/197) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (32/52) |
85% (310/262) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (129/119) |
15% (310/48) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (129/10) |
18% (309/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (92/22) |